<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pro Football Odds &#187; Mark Smith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pro-football-odds.net/author/canutocr/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net</link>
	<description>Full analysis of football odds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>AFC East pretenders battle: Jets at Bills</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/afc-east-pretenders-battle-jets-at-bills</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/afc-east-pretenders-battle-jets-at-bills#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFC East pretenders battle: Jets at Bills]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-football-odds.net/?p=402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the Pats and Dolphins both losing last week it gave the cellar dwellers in the AFC East a chance to catch up and perhaps even make the division interesting again.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/afc-east-pretenders-battle-jets-at-bills/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle for Ohio: Browns at Bengals</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/the-battle-for-ohio-browns-at-bengals</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/the-battle-for-ohio-browns-at-bengals#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The battle for Ohio: Browns at Bengals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-football-odds.net/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though the football odds list the Cincinnati Bengals as 14 points favorites at home versus the Browns in the week 12 action do not assume that this result is a foregone conclusion.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/the-battle-for-ohio-browns-at-bengals/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rams versus in Cardinals in the desert</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/rams-versus-in-cardinals-in-the-desert</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/rams-versus-in-cardinals-in-the-desert#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rams versus in Cardinals in  the desert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-football-odds.net/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All things being equal the Cards should dominate this pro football odds matchup.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/rams-versus-in-cardinals-in-the-desert/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are the Jets for Real?</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/are-the-jets-for-real</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/are-the-jets-for-real#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wagering on NFL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-football-odds.net/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some football odds situations just don’t sound right coming off the tongue and the following phrase: “the Jets are a good team” is one of them. But believe it. Through two games the Jets have looked like one of the best football odds teams in the league.
And all this with a rookie QB and a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/are-the-jets-for-real/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Packers Looking For Cincy Beat Down</title>
		<link>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/packers-looking-for-cincy-beat-down</link>
		<comments>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/packers-looking-for-cincy-beat-down#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pro football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl football odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Packers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pro-football-odds.net/?p=215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fewer teams in the AFC were hyped up more than the Cincinnati Bengals during the football odds offseason. And fewer teams failed to live up to said hype more spectacularly than the Bengals. The supposedly transformed scored one measly TD and lost the home opener to a Broncos team that most top ten college teams [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pro-football-odds.net/pro-football-odds/packers-looking-for-cincy-beat-down/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
